937 So. 2d 658 - Smith v. Krosschell’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 176 So. 2d 81 - Walter v. Schuler · 885 So. 2d 277 - Zingale v. Powell · 887 So. 2d 1023 - Warner v. City of Boca Raton · 263 So. 2d 579 - Korash v. Mills · 729 So. 2d 371 - Smith v. Welton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Save Our Homes cap does not forever “lock in” the erroneous data and resulting assessment, thereby allowing property owners to forever pay artificially reduced taxes as long as they own the property. Instead, we conclude that section 197.122(1) applies to correct this error, thereby allowing the appraiser to correct the erroneous data previously entered and erroneously changed to establish forever a “true just value” upon which the cap can be applied to tax increases in future years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nikolits v. Haney“totally eliminates the improvements on real property”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DeFrances v. Furst
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.