Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

937 So. 2d 702

Docket No. 5D06-1185.

Price v. State

Herbert N. PRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 2006.

Rehearing Denied September 18, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-08-11

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2014

4 state decisions

Relies on Guglielmo v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-08-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Herbert N. Price, Okeechobee, Pro Se.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Herbert N. Price appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Price was convicted of sexual battery on a physically incapacitated person and sentenced to prison in March 2003. He voluntarily dismissed his appeal. In March 2005, Price filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing on six of Price's claims, summarily denying only one. Following the evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied relief. Price's appeal of that order is pending in this Court. See Price v. State, No. 5D06-890 (Fla. 5th DCA filed Mar. 16, 2006).

¶5Price then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the trial court, alleging that the information charging him with the crime was fatally defective as it failed to allege an essential element of the offense. The trial court correctly held that a habeas corpus petition cannot be used to litigate matters that could have *703 and should have been raised on direct appeal. This includes the legal sufficiency of the information. See Moore v. State,817 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

¶6AFFIRMED.

¶7PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

/937/so2d/702 · .json · Public domain