Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 937 SW2D 258 - Kamp v. Grantham

Kamp v. Grantham’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. M. J. Gorzik Corp. v. Mosman · Schneider v. Sunset Pools of St. Louis, Inc. · Larimer v. Robertson · Stellwagen v. Gates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The associate circuit judge who entered this judgment shall on his own initiative, or on the motion of either party, as soon as possible after timely notice to all parties, set a date at which time he shall enter an order setting aside all entries made on or after October 9,1996, and treat the case as finally submitted on that new date. The associate circuit judge shall then enter a judgment within the time period mandated by § 517.111.2, RSMo 1994.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.