Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

937 S.W.2d 479

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1997

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1997-01-29

Relies on Rodriguez v. State · Matamoros v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-01-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 164 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably King v. State (1997), Ladd v. State (1999)

2 federal appellate · 160 state decisions

920199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BAIRD, J.

¶1concurs.

¶2For the reasons stated in Matamoros v. State, 901 S.W.2d 470, 479 (Tex.Cr.App.1995) (Baird, J. concurring), I again object to the gratuitous naming of the decedent in this case. This practice is particularly objectionable in the instant case because appellant forcibly raped the decedent’s nine year old daughter. Therefore, even though the Court’s opinion does not name the child, it accomplishes the same by naming her mother. This is contraiy to our policy in child victim cases. See e.g., Rodriguez v. State, 819 S.W.2d 871, 872 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). For these reasons, I join only the judgment of the Court.

OVERSTREET, Justice.

¶3For reasons I have previously stated in Morris v. State, — S.W.2d-, 1996 WL 514833 (Tex.Cr.App. No 71,799, delivered September 11, 1996) (Overstreet, J., dissenting), I dissent to the treatment of point of error number twenty-two, which avers error in precluding appellant from advising venire-members of the fact that a defendant sentenced to life for capital murder would be required to serve a minimum of 40 years before becoming eligible for parole.

/937/sw2d/479 · .json · Public domain