Dean v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1111
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · Dandridge v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the Ex Post Facto Clause, legislation may not be given retrospective application ‘which imposes a punishment for an act which was not punishable at the time it was committed: or imposes additional punishment to that then prescribed.’ ” Dean v. United States, 938 A.2d 751, 753, 770 (D.C.2007) (quoting Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 28 , 101 S.Ct. 960 , 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981) (citing U.S. Const, art. 1, § 9, cl. 3; art. I, § 10, cl. D). . The Stogner Court thought that the law could also fall into Calder's fourth category. Because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The rule of stare decisis is never properly invoked unless in the decision put forward as precedent the judicial mind has been applied to and passed upon the precise question,” Murphy v. McCloud, 650 A.2d 202, 205 (D.C. 1994) (quoting Fletcher v. Scott, 201 Minn. 609 , 277 N.W. 270, 272 (1938)), and we therefore are not bound by Dean. 8 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.