Hidahl v. Gilpin County Department of Social Services’s Empirical Analysis
938 F.2d 1150 · 1991
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 671 (§ 471 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Malley v. Briggs · Butz v. Economou · Davis v. Scherer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not create independent causes of action, it simply defines procedures under which remedies may be sought in civil rights actions.” Hi-dahl v. Gilpin County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 938 F.2d 1150 , 1152 (10th Cir.1991) (quotation omitted). And while § 1988(b)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hile there need not be 'strict [or precise] factual correspondence between the cases establishing the law and the case at hand,' there must nonetheless be 'some ... factual correspondence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under Harlow , even an allegation of malice ... is insufficient to subject a defendant in a proceeding of this sort 'to the costs of trial or to the burdens of a broad reaching discovery.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.