Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 F.2d 162 - United States v. Martin

United States v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

938 F.2d 162 · 1991

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
July 2011
most recently cited

39 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably United States v. Joetzki (1991), United States v. Harrington (1991)

39 federal appellate ·

500199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · Holywell Corp. v. Bank of New York · United States v. Morales · Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Ass'n v. Austin Products Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'I'm not sure that even had I the power to depart downward I would do it,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “dependence upon drugs, or separation from such a dependency, is not a proper basis for a downward departure from the guidelines.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Drug dependence ... is not a reason for imposing a sentence below the guidelines. Substance abuse is highly correlated to an increased propensity to commit crime. Due to this increased risk, it is highly recommended that a defendant who is incarcerated also be sentenced to supervised release with a requirement that the defendant participate in an appropriate substance abuse program.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.