United States v. One Million Three Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand Two Hundred Forty-Two Dollars & Fifty-Eight Cents’s Empirical Analysis
938 F.2d 433 · 1991
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1605 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 524 · 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (§ 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Braswell v. United States · Doe v. United States · Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · One Lear Jet Aircraft v. United States · Fleet Factors Corp. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the res at issue here is merely an entry in a Justice Department account with the United States Treasury. In other words, the res is an obligation on the part of the Treasury to disburse the specified sum to the Department of Justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“deposited ... in the Justice Department's Seized Asset Deposit Fund, an account with the United States Treasury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.