Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 F.2d 502 - Defender Industries Incorporated v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Defender Industries Incorporated G

Defender Industries Incorporated v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Defender Industries Incorporated G’s Empirical Analysis

938 F.2d 502 · 1991

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Cline v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (1998), Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (1993)

26 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

4001991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Tull v. United States · Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc. · Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip · Mississippi v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “against the clear weight of the evidence, or is based upon evidence which is false, or will result in a miscarriage of justice.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “to determine if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the party [who] oppos[ed] the motion, [the] jury could reasonably find in favor of that party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we hold that the seventh amendment guarantees the right to a jury determination of the amount of punitive damages”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.