Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 F.2d 519 - United States v. Pinckney

United States v. Pinckney’s Empirical Analysis

938 F.2d 519 · 1991

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
December 2009
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3156 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Bifulco v. United States · Ladner v. United States · United States v. One 1971 Mercedes Benz 2-Door Coupe, Serial No. 11304412023280 · United States v. Gravely · United States v. Adkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mitigating circumstance of a kind or to a degree”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “did so when they found ... the career offender status over-represented the defendant's criminal history.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a prior adult federal or state conviction for an offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, regardless of whether such offense is specifically designated as a felony and regardless of the actual sentence imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.