Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 F.2d 659 - Blackman v. Busey

Blackman v. Busey’s Empirical Analysis

938 F.2d 659 · 1991

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Sierra Club v. Slater (1997), Robinson v. National Transportation Safety Board (1994)

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

170199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. First Lincolnwood Corporation · Nevada Airlines, Inc. v. Bond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Lawrence E. Woznick v. Thomas C. Richards, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration · James H. Shelton v. David R. Hinson, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
  2. “'It does not matter that other reasonable conclusions are theoretically possible' (or even desirable from our standpoint).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. McCarthney v. Busey · Evan P. Singer v. Jane F. Garvey, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
  3. “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Larry L. Smith v. National Transportation Safety Board, and Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration · Lawrence E. Woznick v. Thomas C. Richards, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.