Storment v. C O'Malley’s Empirical Analysis
938 F.2d 86 · 1991
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2024
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he United States Supreme Court has espoused a strong federal policy against federal-court interference with pending state judicial proceedings absent extraordinary circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kozel v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.