Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 NE2D 25 - Wicker v. McIntosh

Wicker v. McIntosh’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bernstein v. Glavin · Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. · Gilman v. Hohman · Estate of Hofgesang v. Hansford · Niccum v. Niccum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The interpretation of an insurance policy presents a question of law that is appropriate for summary judgment. If the language in the policy is unambiguous then it should be given its plain and ordinary meaning. But, if the language is ambiguous, the policy should be strictly construed against the insurer. Finally, the terms of a contract are not ambiguous merely because controversy exists between the parties concerning the proper interpretation of terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.