Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 NE2D 837 - Saffold v. State

Saffold v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Arizona v. Gant · Mitchell v. State · State v. Bulington · In re Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search or seizure, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining reasonableness under Section 11, we recognize that Indiana citizens are concerned not only with personal privacy but also with safety, security, and protection from crime.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.