Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 N.E.2d 857 - Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. Thompson · Fobar v. Vonderahe · Pitman v. Pitman · In Re the Marriage of Buntin · Goodman v. Goodman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In deference to the trial court’s proximity to the issues, we disturb the jhdg ment only where there is no evidence supporting the findings or the findings fail to support the judgment. We do not reweigh the evidence, but consider only the evidence favorable to the trial court’s judgment. Those appealing the trial court’s judgment must establish that the findings' are clearly erroneous. Findings are clearly' erroneous when a review of the record leaves us firmly convinced that a mistake has been made. We do not defer to conclusions of law, however, and evaluate them de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.