Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 P2D 111 - People v. Smith

People v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2024

19 state decisions

801997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Milanovich v. United States · Turner v. Arkansas · People v. James · Maisel v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a legislative intent is shown to limit prosecution to the special statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a comprehensive and thorough regulatory scheme to control all aspects”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.