Lund v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Seeley v. Expert, Inc. · 23 Cal. 3d 630 - Dew v. Appleberry · 15 Utah 2d 254 - Snyder v. Clune · Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. Leavitt · 23 Utah 2d 22 - Rice v. Granite School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“denial of a motion to reconsider summary judgment [is reviewed] under rule 60(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure for abuse of discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even if [the defendant] had departed from the state, he was still subject to service of process pursuant to the nonresident motor vehicle act. Thus, under our [prior] decision in Snyder, section 78-12-85 would not operate to toll the statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Olseth v. Larson“with the expansion of means by which jurisdiction can be obtained over a defendant who has left the state, there may not be the same need for our tolling statute as previously existed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Olseth v. Larson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.