Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 SO2D 1254 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Santobello v. New York · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Iannelli v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where there is a `reasonable likelihood that the increase in sentence is the product of actual vindictiveness on the part of the sentencing authority,' there is a presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “However, when no such likelihood exists, it is the defendant's burden to prove actual vindictiveness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.