938 So. 2d 352 - Bonds v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · United States v. Ewell · United States v. Loud Hawk · Strunk v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) to protect the accused against oppressive pretrial imprisonment; (2) to relieve the accused of the anxiety and public suspicion due to an unresolved criminal charge; and (3) to protect against the risk that evidence will be lost or memories dimmed by the passage of time[,] thus impairing a defendant’s ability to defend himself or herself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.