Sims v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Canter v. Koehring Company · 639 So. 2d 216 - Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv. · 782 So. 2d 606 - Perkins v. Entergy Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requirement, La. C.C. art. 403 provides that it should be admitted unless its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay or waste of time. [5] According to defendant, during summation and rebuttal, plaintiffs' counsel repeatedly stated that Olin”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“determination of the facts must be based upon the testimony [they] hear and the other evidence that is submitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.