¶2Movant appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
938 S.W.2d 295
Cofer v. State
Decided January 28, 1997
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-01-28
Decided 1997-01-28