Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 SW2D 373 - State v. Denton

State v. Denton’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Dixon v. State (2001), State v. Godsey (2001)

2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

2301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Teague v. Lane · Brown v. Ohio · United States v. Dixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a Blockburger analysis of the statutory offenses; (2) an analysis, guided by the principles of Duchac [v. State, 505 S.W.2d 237 (Term.1973)7, of the evidence used to prove the offenses; (3) a consideration of whether there were multiple victims or discrete acts; and (4) a comparison of the purposes of the respective statutes. None of these steps is determinative; rather the results of each must be weighed and considered in relation to each other.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “One test of identity of offenses is whether the same evidence is required to prove them. If the same evidence is not required, then the fact that both charges relate to, and grow out of, one transaction, does not make a single offense where two are defined by the statutes.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]here the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provi sion requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.