Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 938 SW2D 659 - Fluker v. Lynch

Fluker v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2016

5 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Herbert v. Harl · Artman v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts · National Indemnity Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the standpoint of both parties, the car had been permanently relinquished to Lynch. Thus, we conclude that this case is not a negligent entrustment case. If anything, it is a claim of “negligent sale” of a vehicle.. No such theory has been pleaded; and, although plaintiffs hint at such an idea in their brief, plaintiffs provide us with no authority for such a theory. •”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.