Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 A2D 77 - State v. Gauthier

State v. Gauthier’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2026

20 state decisions

120200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State v. Charette · State v. Hewey · State v. Pierce · United States v. Edelkind

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we will not grant relief unless the error in the instructions is so highly prejudicial and so taints the proceedings as to virtually deprive the defendant of a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.