Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 F.2d 1076 - United States v. Greer

United States v. Greer’s Empirical Analysis

939 F.2d 1076 · 1991

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Georgia v. McCollum (1992), United States v. Peters (1992)

63 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

5701991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brady v. State of Maryland · Glasser v. United States · Batson v. Kentucky · Bruton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or (B) that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Defendants are entitled to a multiple conspiracy instruction when they specifically and timely request such an instruction and their theory of multiple conspiracies is supported by the law and has some foundation in the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] critical consideration in Bruton claims is whether the out-of-court statement at issue clearly implicates the codefendant; if the statement does not do so, no serious Bruton issue is presented.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.