Hoeber National Labor Relations Board v. Local United Slate Tile & Composition Roofers Damp and Waterproof Workers Association’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(b) It shall be an unfair labor practice for a labor organization or its agents to— (4)(ii) to threaten, coerce, or restrain any person engaged in commerce or in an industry affecting commerce, where ... an object thereof is— ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ # (D) forcing or requiring any employer to assign particular work to employees in a particular labor organization or in a particular trade, craft, or class rather than to employees in another labor organization or in another trade, craft, or class____”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Hoeber v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98

2. “properly exercised its discretion in holding that a 10(l ) injunction would not be just and proper in this case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Local United Slate Tile and Composition Roofers Damp and Waterproof Workers Association v. National Labor Relations Board

3. “appropriate injunctive relief pending the final adjudication of the Board”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Local United Slate Tile and Composition Roofers Damp and Waterproof Workers Association v. National Labor Relations Board