United States v. Bechtol’s Empirical Analysis
939 F.2d 603 · 1991
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably United States v. Foree (1995), United States v. Edge (1993)
24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Alaska · White v. Illinois · United States v. Corley · United States v. Malbrough · United States v. Carlisle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“--is a plant); United States v. Eves, 932 F.2d 856 , 859 (10th Cir.1991) (endorsing holding in United States v. Fitol, 733 F.Supp. 1312, 1315 (D.Minn.1990), that there must be evidence of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'individual growth after the severance, such as growing of roots' "); United States v. Speltz, 733 F.Supp. 1311, 1312 (D.Minn.1990) ("cuttings with roots”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.