Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 F.2d 638 - Schleck v. Ramsey County

Schleck v. Ramsey County’s Empirical Analysis

939 F.2d 638 · 1991

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Krentz v. Robertson Fire Protection District (2000), Ruth Simmons Herts v. Gary Smith (2003)

20 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

170199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Anderson v. Creighton · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he tenured public employee is entitled to oral or written notice of the charges against him, an explanation of the employer's evidence, and an opportunity to present his side of the story.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a public employee has the right to a name-clearing hearing at a meaningful time if his termination is accompanied by stigmatizing reasons for his termination that might impair future employment opportunities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The hearing does not have to precede the termination decision, but only must precede the termination of benefits. It does not have to be a formal hearing; informal meetings with supervisors are sufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.