Wainwright v. Secretary of Health & Human Services’s Empirical Analysis
939 F.2d 680 · 1991
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Embrey v. Bowen · Gonzalez v. Sullivan · Booz v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Varney v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Clem v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`new or additional evidence offered must bear directly and substantially on the matter in dispute'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Remand for consideration of new evidence is appropriate if a claimant presents evidence that is material to determining disability, and there is good cause for the failure to produce the evidence earlier.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.