Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 F.2d 924 - Sun v. Forrester

Sun v. Forrester’s Empirical Analysis

939 F.2d 924 · 1991

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2014

1 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Dennis v. Sparks · Watson v. Ault · Clark v. State of Georgia Pardons and Paroles Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] judge is absolutely immune from suit in performing his judicial responsibilities”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.