Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 F.2d 929 - United States v. Suarez

United States v. Suarez’s Empirical Analysis

939 F.2d 929 · 1991

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez De Varon (1999), United States v. McVay (2006)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

1601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Goldsboro Christian Schools, Inc. v. United States · Youngberg v. United States · Freeman v. Zahradnick · United States v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The district court's reasons must be sufficiently specific so that an appellate court can engage in the meaningful review envisioned by the Sentencing Guidelines.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When evaluating a district court's reasons for imposing a particular sentence, an appellate court may consider the record from the entire sentencing hearing and need not rely upon the district court's summary statement made at the closing of the sentencing hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.