Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies Inc’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 45 U.S.C. § 651 · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 4
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Gibbons v. Ogden · Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph · Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is narrower than the more open-ended formulations 'affecting commerce' and 'involving commerce'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“information regarding the industry in which the class of workers is engaged”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“information regarding the work performed by those workers,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.