Samayoa Cabrera v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Zannino · Elien v. Ashcroft · Settenda v. Ashcroft · Mazariegos-Paiz v. Holder · Z-Z-O
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[F]or the purposes of BIA review, the IJ's 'predictive findings of what may or may not occur in the future are findings of fact . . . subject to a clearly erroneous standard of review.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is more likely than not that he . . . would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“call[ed] the IJ's determination 'correct' and 'cite[d] legal authority for its conclusion.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.