Breiding v. Eversource Energy’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
31 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 3431 · 15 U.S.C. § 717 · 15 U.S.C. § 717C · 15 U.S.C. § 717C · 15 U.S.C. § 717T · 16 U.S.C. § 824 (§ 201 of the Federal Power Act of 1920) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin · State of Georgia v. Pennsylvania R Co · Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co. · California v. Federal Power Commission · Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that allows such transactions to proceed at market rates, see 18 C.F.R. § 284.402 . Direct purchasers of natural gas also pay for the transmission of natural gas from the wellhead. The Algonquin Gas pipeline serves as the primary interstate artery through which natural gas is transported in New England. Direct purchasers in New England must reserve transmission capacity -- that is, the physical space in the pipeline needed to transport the natural gas purchased from the producer -- along the Algonquin pipeline commensurate with their transportation needs. FERC also has”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“which sets the price paid to all the generators whose bids were accepted. Approximately half of New England's electricity is generated from natural gas power plants. As a result, bids from natural gas generators usually set the clearing price for wholesale electricity, which then drives the retail prices charged by LSEs to retail consumers. FERC does not oversee the retail sale of electricity. See FERC v. Elec. Power Supply Ass'n, 136 S. Ct. 760, 766 (2016) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) are met, Algonquin shall consent to such increase or decrease in deliveries, thereby nullifying any daily scheduling or hourly scheduling penalty that would otherwise - 10 - be applicable pursuant to Section 23 of the General Terms and Conditions. Id. (alterations in original) (quoting Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC Tariff, pt. 5, Rate Schedule AFT-E, § 4.3). Similarly, an LDC”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.