Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 FSUPP 321 - Riggs v. Schappell

Riggs v. Schappell’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2010

4 district · 1 state decisions

70199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78E (§ 5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78Q (§ 17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Cort v. Ash · Carnegie v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.