Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 N.E.2d 1111 - State v. Laker

State v. Laker’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ben-Yisrayl v. State · Griffin v. State · Patterson v. State · State v. Isaacs · Gebhard v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) stating the name of the offense in the words of the statute or any other words conveying the same meaning; (3) citing the statutory provision alleged to have been violated, except that any failure to include such a citation or any error in such a citation does not constitute grounds for reversal of a conviction where the defendant was not otherwise misled as to the nature of the charges against the defendant^ 11 (4) setting forth the nature and elements of the offense charged in plain and concise language without unnecessary repetition; (5) stating the date of the offense with sufficient particularity to show that the offense was committed within the period of limitations applicable to that offense; [and] (6) stating the time of the offense as definitely as can be done if time is of the essence of the offense[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.