939 N.W.2d
Volume 939 — North Western Reporter, Second Series
11 opinions
- 939 N.W.2d 2State v. Pagenkopf (2020)
A district court has wide discretion in setting the amount of restitution, and the district court does not abuse its discretion by awarding restitution that is within the range of reasonableness. Article I, §25, N.D. Const., does not require restitution beyond what is necessary to make the victim whole.
- 939 N.W.2d 363Lanham v. BNSF Railway Co. (2020)
- 939 N.W.2d 373State v. McCulley (2020)
- 939 N.W.2d 405Interest of G.L.D. (2020)
The district court must state the specific factual findings used in determining an individual is likely to reoffend and has serious difficulty controlling personal behavior and errs as a matter of law if the findings are insufficient or do not support the legal conclusion.
- 939 N.W.2d 413Rieger v. Ackerman (2020)
District courts have broad discretion in partition actions to do equity and make a fair division of the property or proceeds between the parties and have wide flexibility in ordering proper relief for the parties. There is no bright-line rule in deciding whether great prejudice would result from a partition.
- 939 N.W.2d 484State v. A.D. (2020)
- 939 N.W.2d 757Sabino v. Ozuna (2020)
- 939 N.W.2d 763State v. Gomez (2020)
- 939 N.W.2d 768Seldin v. Estate of Silverman (2020)
- 939 N.W.2d 808State v. Sierra (2020)
- 939 N.W.2d 832In re Interest of Taeson D. (2020)