Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 P2D 1223 - State v. Lee

State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Watson (2002), State v. Misquadace (2002)

28 state decisions

1901997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 423 - State v. Peterson · 108 Wash. 2d 212 - State v. Perkins · State v. Gibson · 128 Wash. 2d 151 - State v. Lee · State v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Agreements to forgo seeking an exceptional sentence, to decline prosecuting all offenses, to pay restitution on uncharged crimes, and to waive the right to appeal are all permissible components of valid plea agreements.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “are two or more offenses within the jurisdiction and venue of the same court that are based on the same conduct. CrR 4.3.1(b)(1).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"prosecutors from harassing a defendant by bringing successive charges over a long span of time even though all charges stem from the same criminal episode. When multiple charges stem from the same criminal conduct or criminal episode, the State must prosecute all related charges within the speedy trial time limits."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.