939 So. 2d 1148 - Stennes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 626 So. 2d 185 - Popple v. State · 803 So. 2d 880 - Young v. State · 872 So. 2d 1000 - Pantin v. State · Ippolito v. State · Richardson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To justify an investigatory stop, the arresting officer had to have a reasonable suspicion that [Mitchell] had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“On appeal of a motion to suppress evidence, this court defers to the trial court's factual findings but reviews legal conclusions de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mitchell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.