Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

939 So. 2d 1158

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 20, 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-10-20

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on Gilbert v. State · Forszpaniak v. Forszpaniak

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-10-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Sheldon K. Taylor challenges the denial of his motion for jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the postconviction court’s order because Taylor’s motion is facially insufficient. See Gilbert v. State, 805 So.2d 70 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Colosimo v. State, 775 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Taylor’s right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion.

¶2Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
/939/so2d/1158 · .json · Public domain