Lee v. State

WILLIE R. LEE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Opinion filed September 27, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-09-27

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2019

14 state decisions

Relies on Williams v. State · Rowe v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-09-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Willie R. Lee, pro se, Appellant.

¶2Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order, dated August 9, 2006, we dismiss this appeal. The trial court found the appellant's claims in his rule 3.850 motion facially insufficient and dismissed the motion without prejudice to refile a facially sufficient motion. Rowe v. State, 932 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Therefore, the trial court's order is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. Williams v. State, 884 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

¶5DISMISSED.

¶6ALLEN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

¶7NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.