Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

939 So. 2d 166

Cargile v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 29, 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-09-29

Relies on 866 So. 2d 23 - Hitchcock v. State

Decided 2006-09-29

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to whatever right Mr. Cargile may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. See Hitchcock v. State, 866 So.2d 23 (Fla.2004).

CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
/939/so2d/166 · .json · Public domain