State v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 922 So. 2d 517 - State v. Pigford · 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate · 621 So. 2d 769 - State v. Shelton · 420 So. 2d 1126 - State v. Graham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough the jurisprudence prior to State v. Johnson was not uniform, some cases reasoned that R.S. 15:529.1 B prohibited the double-counting only of `predicate offenses' obtained on the same day and allowed the enhancement of multiple `instant offenses.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hile State v. Johnson did not explicitly overrule State ex rel. Porter, supra, it did overrule State ex rel. Mims v. Butler, 601 So.2d 649 (La.1992), which approved the rationale of State ex rel. Porter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[m]ultiple convictions obtained on the same day prior to October 19, 2004, shall be counted as one conviction for the purpose of this Section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.