Townsend v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · McClain v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the facts and inferences so considered point in favor of the accused with sufficient force that reasonable men could not have found beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty, reversal and discharge are required.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Tillis v. State · Robinson v. State“in considering whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction in the face of a motion for ... judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the critical in quiry is whether the evidence shows “beyond a reasonable doubt that [the] accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances that every element of the offense existed; and where the evidence fails to meet this test it is insufficient to support a conviction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McCallum v. State“A person is guilty of aggravated assault if he (a) attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life; or (b) attempts to cause or purposely or knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon or other means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McCallum v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.