State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Kothe v. State (2004), Oldham v. State (1998)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Weeks v. United States · Nix v. Williams · Burdeau v. McDowell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case. In any case where the legal evidence raises an issue hereunder, the jury shall be instructed that if it believes, or has a reasonable doubt, that the evidence was obtained in violation of the provisions of this Article, then and in such event, the jury shall disregard any such evidence so obtained.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dunn v. State · Jenschke v. State“the plain language of a statute, not the legislative history behind it, dictates our interpretation of that statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Ellis · Miles v. State“mean[s] ... what it says: that evidence illegally obtained by an `officer or other person' ought be suppressed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.