Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 939 S.W.2d 882 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Johnson (2006), State v. Smith (1997)

50 state decisions

360199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Chambers · State v. Jones · State v. Bayless · Shirrell v. Missouri Edison Co. · Wingate Ex Rel. Carlisle v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clearly against the logic of the circumstances then before the court and is so arbitrary and unreasonable as to shock the sense of justice and indicate a lack of careful consideration; if reasonable [persons] can differ about the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, then it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Has anybody here ever been involved in the prosecution or defense of a criminal case? In other words, have you ever gone to court to help a friend out, testify in a criminal case, or been a state’s witness in any type of case? Anybody been called to testify? I see no hands. Is there anybody here who has a family member or close personal friend who has ever been charged or arrested or convicted of a crime?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When juror misconduct occurs during a felony trial, the verdict will be set aside unless the state affirmatively proves that despite the misconduct, the other jurors were not subjected to improper influences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.