¶1— In a divorce action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kunzeman, J.), dated December 16, 1982, as granted the plaintiff wife’s motion for an examination before trial. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The plaintiff has demonstrated “unusual and unanticipated conditions” warranting further disclosure (see 22 NYCRR 675.7). Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
94 A.D.2d 793
Tucker v. Tucker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 1983
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1983-05-31
Decided 1983-05-31