Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 A.D.2d 979

Serusa v. Serusa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1983-05-25

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1995

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-05-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1— Motion granted and appeal dismissed as moot. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from that part of an order which granted the defendant’s motion to amend the answer. The order also granted plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the complaint. The service of an amended complaint renders the appeal moot, since the defendant is now required to serve a new answer to the amended complaint (see 10 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac, § 70:262). Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ. [Order entered May 20, 1983.]

/94/ad2d/979 · .json · Public domain