Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 ARIZ 104 - State v. Beatty

State v. Beatty’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1971
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Everett v. State · United States v. Gutterman · State v. Walker · State v. Lantz · State v. Graninger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Continuances are, to a great extent, discretionary with the trial court, and an appellate tribunal will not review its action in this respect unless it clearly appears that the. discretion has been abused.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘ * * * Even if it be assumed that defendant was represented by counsel not of his own choosing, it clearly is evident that he was fully accorded his constitutional right to representation by counsel, and that it would not have been reversible error had the trial court refused to accede to the personal desires of defendant in the matter, (cases cited.)’ ” (Footnote omitted). 94 Ariz. at 105 , 382 P.2d at 221 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.