State v. Randall’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably In the Interest of L.J. (2013), State v. Toste (1986)
2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · MacIas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The officers had a reasonable ground to arrest Leeper. Having good information that she was in possession of the gun, they were entitled to arrest her for carrying a concealed weapon 'without a warrant at any time of the day or night/ A.R.S. § 13-911 (B).' “As an incident of a legal arrest the search was lawful and not within the ambit of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In a criminal case instructions must be based on some theory which may be found in the evidence and when not so predicated, they should not be given, as their tendency would be to mislead the jury. [Citation]” State v. Randall, 94 Ariz. 417, 419-420 , 385 P.2d 709, 710 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lovell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.